Adams v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Held, that the sole or principal support of a first cousin or other individual of a more remote degree of blood relationship does not entitle the taxpayer to the exemption of a "head of a family."
1Opinion of the Court
MARY B. ADAMS, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.
Adams v. Commissioner
Docket No. 103197.
United States Board of Tax Appeals
45 B.T.A. 193; 1941 BTA LEXIS 1164;
September 25, 1941, Promulgated
Held, that the sole or principal support of a first cousin or other individual of a more remote degree of blood relationship does not entitle the taxpayer to the exemption of a "head of a family."
George E. Hamilton, Jr., Esq., and John L. Hamilton, Esq., for the petitioner.
E. L. Corbin, Esq., for the respondent.
KERN
This case involves deficiencies in income tax in the following…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Tracy v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1939
- Howard v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1940
- Adams v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941