Legal Opinion

Soro v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

Court of Appeals of Nevada

Decided December 28, 2017No. 72086PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, SILVER, C.J.:

In this opinion, we determine whether Utah's antideficiency statute applies extraterritorially to a Nevada deficiency action. Petitioners moved to dismiss the underlying case on the ground that it was time-barred by Utah's antideficiency statute, which they maintained applied to the dispute pursuant to the parties' choice-of-law provision. The district court considered that statute, concluded it did not apply extraterritorially, and denied petitioners' motion to dismiss. This original petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition seeking to compel the dismissal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Buzz Stew, LLC v. City of North Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Smith v. Eighth Judicial District Court of State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Key Bank of Alaska v. DonnelsNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Nevares v. M.L.S.Utah Supreme Court · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Engelson v. Dignity HealthCourt of Appeals of Nevada · 2023
  2. 8933 Square Knot Trust v. Bank of New York MellonNevada Supreme Court · 2026
  3. Sonia Feldman v. Mark Anthony Sawyer, et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API