Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Troncalli Chrysler Plymouth Dodge
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided September 12, 2003No. 1021135Published
1Opinion of the Court
876 So.2d 459 (2003)
Ex parte TRONCALLI CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH DODGE, INC.
(In re David J. Case
v.
Alexander Dodge Chrysler Plymouth, Inc., et al.).
1021135.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
September 12, 2003.
Nicholas B. Roth and Heather L. Necklaus of Eyster, Key, Tubb, Weaver & Roth, LLP, Decatur, for petitioner.
Charles E. Robinson, Jr., of The Robinson Law Firm, P.C., Ashville, for respondent.
WOODALL, Justice.
Troncalli Chrysler Plymouth Dodge, Inc. ("Troncalli"), petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the trial court (1) to vacate its order denying Troncalli's motion to dismiss the claims of…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- David H. Stuart and Richard A. Whitaker v. Richard G. SpademanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Richard A. Daynard v. Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, P.A. Ronald L. Motley, Scruggs, Millette, Bozeman & Dent P.A. Richard F. ScruggsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.