Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 31, 1989No. 88-2064PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by the state from a sentence which departs downwards from the sentencing guidelines. The defendant concedes that the sentence under review must be reversed because the trial court gave no written reasons for departing from the sentencing guidelines, and that the cause must be remanded for the entry of such written reasons. We agree. State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985); State v. Vickery, 536 So.2d 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); State v. Wayda, 533 So.2d 939 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. McDavid, 532 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Adams, 528 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. State v. AdamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Daughtry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. State v. WaydaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  5. State v. McDavidDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Torres v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. State v. BrownDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API