Schroder v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.
The appellant, Schroder, was convicted' for unlawfully manufacturing and possessing intoxicating liquor. The evidence supports the conviction. The sole contention, timely and properly made, is that the evidence was unlawfully obtained by a federal officer through a search of defendants dwelling under an invalid search warrant. The asserted defects of the .warrant are that the evidence of probable cause recited in the warrant differed from that, in the affidavit on which it was issued; that the affidavit contained hearsay as to the purchase of liquor, and did not disclose…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Dumbra v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Steele v. United States No. 2Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Shore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931
- Thompson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1930
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. StewartDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- Scardina v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935