Legal Opinion

Sobey v. Thomas

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1876PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from tRe Circuit Court for Iowa County. Action to restrain defendants from digging and mining on premises described in tire complaint.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from tRe Circuit Court for Iowa County. Action to restrain defendants from digging and mining on premises described in tire complaint. The complaint alleged, in substance, that N. W. Dean was the owner of a certain quarter-quarter section of land, on which there was a valuable range of lead and zinc ores, known as the "Watkins range; that Dean, by his agent Reese, had granted to the assignors of the plaintiffs an oral lease “ to mine and dig for lead and zinc ore, according to mining usages, upon any and every part of so much of the said quarter-quarter section as lies north of a line…

1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.

Tbe material question in this ease is: What rights and privileges were embraced in the verbal lease which was made by Reese, the agent of Dean, with the assignors of the plaintiffs? It was alleged in the complaint, and testimony was offered in support of the averment, that the lease gave the plaintiffs the right to mine not only upon what was known as the Watkins range or works, but also upon any and every part of the forty-acre tract north np to Evan Williams’ land. "But this claim was distinctly negatived by the verdict of the jury and the finding of the circuit court; and we are entirely…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Anderson v. Horlick's Malted Milk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Hildman v. City of PhillipsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Joannes v. MillerdWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Shekey v. EldredgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API