Legal Opinion

King v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 12, 1984No. 151, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES C. MORTON, Jr.,

Associate Judge of the Court of Appeals (retired), Specially Assigned.

In this case, we are confronted with the question whether the State’s failure to provide appellant with adequate notice, pursuant to Maryland Rule 734 b, of its intent to seek enhanced punishment under Maryland Code (1957, 1982 Repl.Vol., 1983 Supp.) Art. 27, § 36B(b), mandates reversal of appellant’s sentence as a subsequent offender for unlawful possession and transportation of a handgun. We conclude that although the State’s notice was defective, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. Graham v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Loveday v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  5. Maguire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Dove v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. In Re Keith W.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. Bowman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. Shilling v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API