Hirsch v. 66-74 Court Street Realty Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order granting respondent’s motion to open default reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The default was willful and no reasonable excuse was presented therefor. Moreover, the proposed answer, is insufficient in law. (Title Guarantee & T. Co. v. 457 Schenectady Ave., Inc., ante, p. 509; Commonwealth Mortgage Co. v. De Waltoff, 135 App. Div. 33, 34; Ettlinger v. P. R. & C. Co., 142 N. Y. 189; Cumming v. Middletown, Unionville & W. G. R. R. Co., 147 App. Div. 105.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth Mortgage Co. v. De WaltoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Ettlinger v. Persian Rug & Carpet Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Cumming v. Middletown, Unionville & Water Gap RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911