Legal Opinion

People v. Leong Yune Gun

California Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1888No. 20412Published

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Foote, C.

The defendant was convicted of an assault with intent to commit murder. From the judgment of conviction, and an order denying a new trial, he has appealed.. The point of objection made to the instructions of the court is, that they omit to inform the jury that one of the elements constituting the crime charged against the defendant must be “a present ability” to do it.

Conceding, under section 240 of the Penal Code, that this element is essential to make out the crime, yet the evidence in this case without conflict shows that who*637ever shot at and wounded the prosecuting witness, Jare…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. SuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API