Legal Opinion

In re the Trust for the Benefit of Wold

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 5, 1998PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLIN, P.J., Ch. Div.

This written decision amplifies an earlier oral bench opinion rendered on plaintiffs petition for interpretation and direction regarding the application of the “New Jersey Uniform Statutory Rule Against Perpetuities”. N.J.S.A. 46:2F-l-8 to a proposed exercise by the beneficiary of her power of appointment under the terms of this 1944 Trust. It is an issue of first impression requiring the court to determine if the ninety year period of N.J.S.A. 46:2F-l-8 enacted on July 3, 1991, may be invoked by the beneficiary in regard to the exercise of that power of appointment…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. TRUSTEES OF RUTGERS COLLEGE IN NJ v. RichmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  2. Marx v. RiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of United States Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  4. Guild v. Mayor of NewarkNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1916
  5. National State Bank of Newark v. MorrisonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. IN THE MATTER OF THE TRUST OF RAY D. POST (P-000817-2012, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API