Legal Opinion

Pullman Co. v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 24, 1924No. 2985. [fn*]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.

(after stating the facts as above). The court below overruled an exception to the amended petition, on the ground that the cause of action set up therein was a new and different cause of action from that set up in the original petition, and was barred by the statute of limitations of two and four years. The contention that the court erred when he ruled as stated presents the only question made on the appeal.

The contention ought to be sustained if appellee’s original petition should be construed as appellant insists it should be, to wit, as basing appellee’s right to the recovery it sought…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pope v. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Bigham v. Talbot & CropperTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. ClippengerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. Maddox Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Sheldon Independent School District v. M. L. Hudson Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Cochran v. CarruthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API