Legal Opinion

Metcalf v. McGuinn

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1985No. 8429SC670Published

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Respondents contend that the trial judge erred in allowing petitioner to take a voluntary dismissal as to part of his petition to establish the true boundary line between his land and that of respondents. Petitioner made the motion for voluntary dismissal prior to trial in Superior Court but after the jury had been impaneled. His motion followed a motion by respondents to dismiss his petition for failure to join necessary parties, other landowners along the disputed line. Petitioner’s motion asked for voluntary dismissal as to the portion of the line bounding the northwest…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Reassignment of HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Sudderth v. . McCombsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API