McLean v. Nicol
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the municipal court of Duluth, denying his motion for a new trial in an action to recover $90 rent reserved in a written lease.
1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.
This was an action for the rent of certain premises in Duluth for the months.of March and April, 1889, under a written lease of the premises for a term commencing June 15, 1888, and ending May 1, 1889. The defendant occupied the premises under the lease from the commencement of the term until the last day of February, 1889, when he left them. As a reason for vacating the premises, and as the basis for his claim that no rent accrued for the months of March and April, defendant alleges that prior to the execution of the lease it was verbally agreed between him and plaintiff that the latter…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Tracy v. Union Iron Works Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- York v. StewardMontana Supreme Court · 1898
- Thompson Foundry & Machine Co. v. GlassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
- Reed v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Trustees of First Presbyterian Church v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.