Legal Opinion

Anadarko Petroleum Corporation,petitioners v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Amoco Production Company, Intervenors

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 21, 2000No. 98-1227 to 98-1232, 98-1297 and 98-1298PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.

2Per curiam

Subsequent to our decision of October 29, 1999, the Commission petitioned for rehearing seeking clarification on the issue of the effective date for refunds discussed in Part V of our opinion. See Anadarko Petroleum Corp. v. FERC, 196 F.3d 1264, 1269-70 (D.C.Cir.1999). Information presented to the Commission in other proceedings indicated that two of the factual assumptions upon which our opinion was premised were incorrect. First, contrary to this panel’s understanding, see id. at 1270, the tax assessment sent to the producers by the State of Kansas…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Public Service Company of Colorado v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Oxy USA Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  2. Anadarko Petroleum Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burlington Resources Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  2. Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API