(PS) Clay v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEROME A. CLAY, No. 2:17-cv-00749-KJM-KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT 13 v. (ECF Nos. 71) 14 AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO. 3, 15 Defendant. 16 17 This case arises from Defendant’s alleged improper denial of short term disability 18 benefits, as governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. The following causes of 19 action survived multiple rounds of motions to dismiss and amendments to the pleadings: 20 (I) failure to provide Plaintiff benefits…