Commonwealth v. Scott
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for dismissal of charges following appellant’s rearrest; after appellant’s first arrest, the same charges had been dismissed. Appellant argues that dismissal was required by Rule 141(d) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure, as it read before its recent amendment, 1 because the cost of the first prosecution had not been paid. The issue before us is whether Rule 141(d) required such cost to be paid prior to any second prosecution or only in cases where the first prosecution had been found to have been without probable…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HetheringtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. DavenportSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. CartagenaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. FlandersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
3Cited by21 opinions
- Robert Stewart v. Lynne AbrahamCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Stewart v. AbrahamCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Gravinese v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- In Re the Interest of C.K.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.