Legal Opinion
In Re Contempt of Ungar
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 3, 1978PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
160 N.J. Super. 322 (1978)
389 A.2d 995
IN THE MATTER OF CONTEMPT OF JACK H. UNGAR, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 3, 1978.
Decided July 3, 1978.
Before Judges FRITZ, BOTTER and ARD.
Mr. Alexander D. Lehrer argued the cause of appellant Jack H. Ungar (Messrs. Anschelewitz, Barr, Ansell & Bonello, attorneys).
Mr. Philip B. Whitcomb, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent State of New Jersey (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General, attorney).
The opinion of the court was delivered by BOTTER, J.A.D.
Appellan…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Sacher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re YengoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- In re DodsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. WarrenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Wright v. Plaza FordNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Matter of DeMarcoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.