In the Interest of K.S.

OPINION

J. Brett Busby, Justice

Following a bench trial, the trial court signed an order appointing appellee, Esther, sole managing conservator of her minor grandchildren.1 Appellants, Michael and Diana, are the children’s parents, and they challenge the order, which named them possessory conservators. Although Diana is permitted supervised visits of the children, Michael is permitted no visitation or access.

On appeal, appellants argue Esther did not have standing to file an original suit seeking sole managing conservatorship of her grandchildren. We conclude that Esther had standing under…