Legal Opinion
State v. Harrod
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 16, 2001No. CR-98-0289-APPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
26 P.3d 492 (2001)
200 Ariz. 309
STATE of Arizona, Appellee.
v.
James Cornell HARROD, Appellant.
No. CR-98-0289-AP.
Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.
July 16, 2001.
Janet Napolitano, Attorney General, by Kent E. Cattani, Chief Counsel, Capital Litigation Section and Monica Beerling Klapper, Assistant Attorney General, Phoenix, Attorneys for the State of Arizona.
James J. Haas, Maricopa County Public Defender, by James H. Kemper and Christopher Johns, Deputy Public Defenders, Phoenix, Attorneys for James Cornell Harrod.
OPINION
MARTONE, Justice.
¶ 1 A jury convicted James Cornell Harrod of premeditated…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harrod v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002