Legal Opinion
Tiger v. Nolen
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 4, 1920No. 9680PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Error from District Court, Hughes County; Geo. C. Crump, Judge. Action by Ewnáh J. Tiger and another against James M. Nolen and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
It was stipulated in this case as follows :
“The defendants in error filed a demurrer to the petition of the plaintiffs in error, and tapón said demurrer coming on for hearing, the parties having agreed in open court that the sole and only question of law to be determined by the court was whether or not the district court could partition the land of a full-blood Indian inherited by a seven-eighths-blood minor.”
This stipulation eliminates from the ease everything, as stated, except the sole question of law, “Whether or not the district court of this state could partition the land of a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Salmon v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
3Cited by4 opinions
- Grease v. McNacSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Bledsoe v. PetersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Childers v. SamuelsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Taylor v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942