Lambeth Rope Co. v. Brigham
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Contract, upon an account annexed, for the price of ropes alleged to have been sold and delivered to the defendant, and for interest. At the trial in the Superior Court, before Bond, J., the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff; and the defendant alleged exceptions, which appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtKnowlton, J.
The exceptions in this case relate only to the first item in the plaintiff’s account, and to the allowance of interest on sundry other items. In regard to the first item, the only exception to the instructions is to a single sentence. The defendant contended that the goods charged in that item, consisting of certain ropes, were furnished by the plaintiff through the defendant as its agent, to be used by another corporation, under an arrangement that the defendant should not pay for the goods until he had collected the price from the corporation receiving and using them, The judge, after…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Edgar v. Joseph Breck & Sons Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Davison v. KlaessNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Ouillette v. SheerinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Doe v. Boston & Worcester Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Braun v. S. F. Hess & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.