Legal Opinion

Bonawitt v. St. Vincent's Hospital

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1932No. 2629PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

An owner in treating a floor may use wax or oil or other substance in the customary manner without incurring liability to one who slips and falls thereon, unless the owner is negligent in the materials he uses or in the manner of applying them. If a recovery is to be had something more müst appear than that the floor has had such treatment as is ordinarly applied in the care of floors.

While the circumstances in S. S. Kresge vs. Fader, 116 Oh St, 718, were not precisely similar to those in the case at bar, yet the principles announced seem,entirely applicable. In that case' water had been…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Spickernagle v. WoolworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  2. Curtiss v. . Lehigh Valley Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Lavine v. United Paper Board CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Brown v. RockSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. WylieSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  2. Kalinowski v. Y.W.C.A.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Asmussen v. New Golden Hotel CompanyNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Nicola v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Walker v. KressSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API