Legal Opinion
Royal Bank of Canada v. Mahrle
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 2, 1993No. 91 Civ. 2588PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PRESKA, District Judge.
This is an action on a promissory note. Plaintiff has moved for summary judgment and for the reasons stated below, the motion is granted.
Background
In 1985, defendant Dale B. Mahrle (“Mahrle”), executed a promissory note in the amount of $500,000 in favor of plaintiff Royal Bank of Canada (“Royal Bank”) dated December 18, 1985 (the “1985 Note”). Affidavit of Dale B. Mahrle in Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment dated December 11, 1992 (“Mahrle Affidavit”) ¶ 2. In conjunction with the execution of the 1985 Note, Jilean International, Inc.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Breed v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Knight v. U.S. Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Marine Midland Bank-Southern v. ThurlowNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Berman v. ParcoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Village on Canon v. Bankers Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- AAI Recoveries, Inc. v. PijuanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Endurance American Specialty Insurance v. Century Surety Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Wrapwell Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.