Legal Opinion

Munzer v. Blaisdell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 19, 1944PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff, who is not an attorney, but appears pro se, has included in one complaint four possible causes of *11action — (1) for damages for breach of section 84 of the Mental Hygiene Law; (2) for damages for breach of section 352 of the Civil Practice Act; (3) for damages for libel for allegedly false statements in the letter of December 24, 1938; and (4) a cause of action for another alleged libel in the publication of statements in the so-called hospital summary. The last cause of action is clearly insufficient as plaintiff fails to set forth the words constituting the alleged libel. (Locke…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Locke v. Benton & Bowles, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. In Re the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  3. Hammock Ex Rel. Hammock v. Hoffmann-LaRoche, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  4. Doe v. RoeNew York Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Krause v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API