Jell-O Co. v. Brown
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
The test of the constitutionality of the ordinance is whether the ordinance is a bona fide exercise of police power or an arbitrary and unreasonable interference with personal rights under the guise of police regulation. The plain purpose appears to be to prohibit the distribution of handbills, etc., in public places without sanction. The requirement is general; it has no discriminatory restrictions ; it is not apparent that the license fee is a charge for the privilege of engaging in business, but rather for the enforcement of governmental supervision.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Caldwell v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Rearick v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Monarski v. AlexandridesNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- May Coal & Grain Co. v. Kansas CityDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1935