Legal Opinion
People v. Fields
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 19, 2012PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant contends that the County Court erred in setting, without a hearing, the amount of restitution he was required to pay. However, since the defendant failed to request a restitution hearing and did not object to the amount of restitution he was required to pay, his present claim regarding the amount of restitution imposed is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Horne, 97 NY2d 404, 414 n 3 [2002]; People v Francis, 82 AD3d 1263 [2011]; People v Nelson, 77 AD3d 973 [2010]; People v Harris, 72 AD3d 1110, 1112 [2010]), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. HorneNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. FrancisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. NelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. WoodsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. FinneganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. JeromeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. ChungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- People v. FinneganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.