Mixon v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · HolcombHolcomb, J.
In this case, we are asked to determine whether, under Texas Rule of Evidence 503, an attorney-client privilege is established when a person consults with a lawyer with a view to obtaining professional legal services from him, even if the lawyer declines to represent that person at the end of the consultation. We hold that it does. A question remains, however, whether appellant in the present case might still not be entitled to the privilege because of the Rule 503(d) exception denying the privilege to a person seeking the services of a lawyer in furtherance of a crime. We therefore…
3Cases cited1 opinion
4Cited by7 opinions
- Danny Lee Mixon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
- Jeffrey D. Busby, Andrea Busby, and Busby Quarter Horse, L.L.C. v. Josh Harvey, DVM, and Outlaw Equine, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2017
- Luke Masood Arabzadegan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
- Luke Masood Arabzadegan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
- Regan Anthony Ellison v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.