Legal Opinion

Mixon v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 23, 2007No. PD-0018-06PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · HolcombHolcomb, J.

In this case, we are asked to determine whether, under Texas Rule of Evidence 503, an attorney-client privilege is established when a person consults with a lawyer with a view to obtaining professional legal services from him, even if the lawyer declines to represent that person at the end of the consultation. We hold that it does. A question remains, however, whether appellant in the present case might still not be entitled to the privilege because of the Rule 503(d) exception denying the privilege to a person seeking the services of a lawyer in furtherance of a crime. We therefore…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mixon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Danny Lee Mixon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  2. Jeffrey D. Busby, Andrea Busby, and Busby Quarter Horse, L.L.C. v. Josh Harvey, DVM, and Outlaw Equine, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2017
  3. Luke Masood Arabzadegan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  4. Luke Masood Arabzadegan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  5. Regan Anthony Ellison v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API