Legal Opinion

In re Isler

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 7, 1946No. 5099PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision • of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims Nos. 1, 2, 21, and 22 in appellant’s application for a patent for an alleged invention relating to “esters of dl toco-pherols which are racemic at the carbon atom in position 2 of the chromane ring.”

Owing to the issues presented,- it is unnecessary that we here quote any of the claims on appeal. It is sufficient to say that claim.' 1 is a generic claim, and that claims 2, 21, and 22 are species claims.

Claims 21 and 22 were rejected by…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Alumatone Corp. v. Vita-Var Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  2. Application of MyersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  3. Myers v. Polk Miller Products Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  4. In Re TamarinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  5. Biogen Ma, Inc. v. Japanese Foundation for Cancer ResearchCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API