Commonwealth v. Sinclair
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellant, incarcerated after revocation of probation, contends that the twenty-three month delay between the violation and the hearing violates due process. Further, he contends that the sentence upon revocation violates double jeopardy. We reject these contentions and, therefore, affirm the judgment of sentence.
The appellant pleaded guilty on May 14, 1970, to charges of aggravated robbery 1 and related offenses. Appellant had been incarcerated from the time of his arrest, and, by the time he appeared for sentencing on June 17, 1970, had already served 21 months in jail.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Commonwealth v. KatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. WronaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. DuffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. ReedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. Trythall, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1978