Hockholzer v. Eager
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada
[This was a bill in equity by Hockholzer and others against Thomas Eager andotbers.]
1Opinion of the Court
BXLLYER, District Judge.
Suit to enjoin the defendants from infringing a patent granted to the complainants for an improved *270machine for framing timbers. The case is before the court upon a motion for an interlocutory injunction, and was heard upon bill, answer and affidavits.
By the application of a few well-settled principles, it will appear that the motion cannot be granted. There has never been any trial at law of the validity of the patent, and while there may be a right to an injunction without such trial, the facts which must be shown to establish that right are clearly pointed out by the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Germain v. WilgusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1895
- Palmer Pneumatic Tire Co. v. Newton Rubber WorksU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia · 1896
- Southwestern Brush Electric Light & Power Co. v. Louisiana Electric Light Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1891
- Blakey v. KurtzU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1897