Legal Opinion

Hockholzer v. Eager

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada

Decided March 17, 1873PublishedCited by 4 opinions

[This was a bill in equity by Hockholzer and others against Thomas Eager andotbers.]

1Opinion of the Court

BXLLYER, District Judge.

Suit to enjoin the defendants from infringing a patent granted to the complainants for an improved *270machine for framing timbers. The case is before the court upon a motion for an interlocutory injunction, and was heard upon bill, answer and affidavits.

By the application of a few well-settled principles, it will appear that the motion cannot be granted. There has never been any trial at law of the validity of the patent, and while there may be a right to an injunction without such trial, the facts which must be shown to establish that right are clearly pointed out by the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Germain v. WilgusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1895
  2. Palmer Pneumatic Tire Co. v. Newton Rubber WorksU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia · 1896
  3. Southwestern Brush Electric Light & Power Co. v. Louisiana Electric Light Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1891
  4. Blakey v. KurtzU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API