Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics Opinion 705

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 19, 2007Published

1DissentJustice Rivera-Soto

In unambiguous terms, the New Jersey Constitution makes clear that “[t]he Supreme Court shall have jurisdiction over the admission to the practice of law and the discipline of persons admitted.” N.J. Const. art. VI, § 2, ¶ 3. In the exercise of that exclusive grant of jurisdiction, we have made clear that “[njeither the Legislature nor the Executive has any power to overrule attorney ethical standards promulgated by this Court[,]” reasoning that, “[ultimately, it is the Court that establishes the ethical standards to which an attorney is held, and neither the Legislature nor the Executive can…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. City of Atlantic CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  2. Matter of GreenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  3. In Re Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics Opinion 621Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  4. Vergopia v. ShakerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API