Legal Opinion

People v. Kaplan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 6, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We are of the opinion that the magistrate under the exception contained in section 5 of the Judiciary Law had the power on Sunday to receive the plea of guilty of the offense charged against this defendant under subdivision 4 of section 887 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (People ex rel. Burke v. Fox, 150 App. Div. 114; affd., 205 N. Y. 490.) However, in this case, inasmuch as the defendant was a minor and it was her first conviction, we have determined to exercise the discretionary power vested in appellate courts by section 543 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and to reduce the sentence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Burke v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. People ex rel. Burke v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  3. People v. ByrneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. Frost, New York County Courts1930
  2. People v. WarnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API