Legal Opinion

City of Steelville v. Scott

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 1984No. 13469PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROW, Presiding Judge.

Stanley M. Scott and Patricia A. Scott appeal from a judgment in favor of the City of Steelville establishing a “roadway easement” across the back of a tract of real estate owned by the Scotts. The judgment ordered the Scotts to remove a “concrete wall” and any other obstacle in the disputed area, and to refrain from hindering the general public in its use of the area as a roadway.

The circumstances whence this case arose can best be understood by reference to the diagram appended hereto, prepared from exhibits received in evidence at the trial.

The trial court found that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Central Pacific Railway Co. v. Alameda CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Jefferson v. NeroSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  3. Cusumano v. Outdoors Today, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Huter v. BirkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  5. Trammell v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Elton v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Gonzales v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API