Legal Opinion

Caniglia v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1982No. 43621Published

1Opinion of the Court

315 N.W.2d 241 (1982)

210 Neb. 404

Elizabeth M. CANIGLIA, Appellant,

v.

CITY OF OMAHA, a metropolitan city, et al., Appellees.

No. 43621.

Supreme Court of Nebraska.

January 22, 1982.

Thomas F. Dowd of Dowd & Fahey, Omaha, for appellant.

Herbert M. Fitle, Omaha City Atty., and Kent N. Whinnery, Omaha, for appellees.

Heard before KRIVOSHA, C. J., BOSLAUGH, McCOWN, CLINTON, BRODKEY, and HASTINGS, JJ., and RONIN, Retired District Judge.

BOSLAUGH, Justice.

This is an appeal from a proceeding in error to review an order of the personnel board of the City of Omaha, Nebraska, dismissing the appeal of the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Elmen v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Young v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Shepherd v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State ex rel. Douglas County v. FrankNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Caniglia v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API