Legal Opinion
People ex rel. Miranda v. Henderson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 24, 1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Habeas corpus is not the proper procedural vehicle for prisoners who claim that the board has not complied with subdivision 6 of section 214 of the Correction Law but we treat such petitions as CPLR article 78 proceedings. (Matter of Greene v Smith, 52 AD2d 292, app dsmd 40 NY2d 826; People ex rel. Ganci v Henderson, 54 AD2d 609 [Sept. 24, 1976].) Relator was denied parole on October 14, 1975 for the following reasons: "1. Past failures while under parole supervision. 2. While under supervision committing new serious crime. 3. Your extensive past…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Watkins v. CaldwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Greene v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- People Ex Rel. Ward v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People ex rel. Ganci v. HendersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
3Cited by4 opinions
- People ex rel. South v. HammockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- People ex rel. Gonzalez v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People ex rel. Denham v. WardNew York Supreme Court · 1983
- People ex rel. Price v. HendersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983