Legal Opinion
Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. Ontario County Health Facility
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 7, 1985PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The motion for leave to appeal should be dismissed upon the ground that the orders sought to be appealed from do not finally determine an action or proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. The orders which granted motions for subpoenas duces tecum in connection with arbitrations are orders which merely administer the course of the arbitrations and such orders are not final (see, e.g., Matter of Howell v New York City Human Resources Admin., 97 AD2d 352, appeal dismissed 61 NY2d 758 [order directing compliance with subpoenas duces tecum to produce…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hutchins v. GorlickiNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Howell v. New York City Human Resources AdministrationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by6 opinions
- Eisic Trading Corp. v. Somerset Marine, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Morgan v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Marten v. Eden Park Health Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Miranda v. MirandaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Amendola v. KendziaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.