O'Fallon v. Boismenu
Supreme Court of Missouri
ERROR from St. Louis Circuit Court..
1Opinion of the CourtM’Girk, C. J.
Boismenu brought an action of assumpsit for use and occupation against Mullanphy; judgment was given for the plaintiff. It appears that Boismenu had, from about the year 1827 or’8, by himself or tenants, occupied and possessed a certain house on Water street in St. Louis j that about-the year 1828, one Daniel McGurrin, now deceased, took possession of the house as the tenant of the plaintiff, and used and occupied the same as such tenant until his death, which happened about the first of December, 1830. That some time before the death of McGurrin. and during his last sickness, John Mullanphy…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Summers v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1901
- Sturges v. BottsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
- McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. StiresNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Palmer v. Kinloch Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1901
- Lee v. Greenville, Spartanburg & Anderson Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917