Legal Opinion

Claim of Berkley v. Irving Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 10, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMercure, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed October 14, 2003, which ruled that claimant did not sustain a causally related disability.

In 1984, while working at Irving Trust Company, claimant suffered a psychotic episode triggered by the stress of her job and applied for workers’ compensation benefits. Her case was established for atypical psychosis and she received benefits until, in 1995, a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge (hereinafter WCLJ) determined that claimant no longer suffered a causally related disability. The Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed.

In August 2000,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Estate of Matusko v. Kennedy Valve Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Joyce v. United Food & Commercial Workers Local 342-50Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Baker v. Orange Heating & CoolingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Claim of Young v. Pentax Precision Instrument Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Williams v. Colgate UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API