Legal Opinion

In re Goldman

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 6, 1930No. 128PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASE, Circuit Judge.

The special master found that the bankrupt in an attempt to conceal the fact, knowingly testified falsely in his bankruptcy proceedings concerning property in which his father, who had died intestate about two years previously, had owned an interest at the time of his death. As one of three children who, with his mother, were the sole heirs, the bankrupt was entitled to share in any such property. The record amply supports the findings of the special master as to the falsity of the testimony, and with the fact of the bankrupt’s attempted concealment the District Court did…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re SlocumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  2. In re BreitlingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1904
  3. In re ConroyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1905

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. LaVangie v. Mazzola (In Re Mazzola)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1980
  2. Willoughby v. JamisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  3. Duggins v. HeffronCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  4. Robbins v. Haynes (In re Haynes)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2016
  5. In Re PerelDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API