Church v. Haeger
New York Court of Common Pleas
Action by George M. Church and another against Annie C. Haeger. A temporary injunction was granted, and plaintiffs now move to continue the same, while defendant makes a cross motion to vacate it. Injunction continued on condition.
1Opinion of the CourtGiegerioh, J.
The omission in the injunction order to recite the grounds for the injunction, as required by section 610 of the Code, is a mere irregularity, and should be disregarded, as the order states that it was made on the verified complaint and the affidavit of William H. Howell, copies of which, containing the grounds on which the order was granted, were served with it on the defendant, and refers the defendant to them as therein stated. Atlantic & P. Tel. Co. v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 46 N. Y. Super. Ct. 377, 409, 410. See Daly v. Amberg (Sup.) 13 N. Y. Supp. 379, 380. The motion to vacate the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Daly v. AmbergNew York Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by2 opinions
- Terry v. GreenNew York Supreme Court · 1907
- Schieffelin v. HylanNew York Supreme Court · 1919