Legal Opinion

Vlahos v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 2003No. 02-154PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

[T1] Eduardo Vlahos appeals from his conviction for conspiracy to commit aggravated robbery under Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 6-L-308(a) and 6-2-401(a) and (c)(ii) (LexisNexis 2008), claiming violation of his right to a speedy trial, insufficiency of the evidence, ineffective assistance of counsel, and improper jury instructions on the law of accomplice/coconspirator testimony. We find no error and affirm.

ISSUES

[T2] Mr. Viahos presents the following issues:

ISSUE I

Whether Appellant was denied his right to a speedy trial when the trial court failed to bring him to trial within 120 days…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. United States v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  5. Ostrowski v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1983

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Berry v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Whitney v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Jontra Holdings Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company Brisbane Angels Nominees Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company and Associated Construction Equipment Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company v. Gas Sensing Technology Corporation, a Wyoming Corporation D/B/A WelldogWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Humphrey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Dean v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API