Legal Opinion

People v. Schultz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 4, 1988No. 87-0133PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McMORROW

Following a bench trial, defendant Albert Schultz was convicted of leaving the scene of a motor vehicle accident involving personal injury without identifying himself to the other driver. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 95V2, pars. 11 — 401, 11 — 403.) He was fined $180 and his driver’s license was revoked. On appeal, defendant presents two questions: (1) whether a challenge to the sufficiency of a charging instrument based upon its failure to allege the element of knowledge must be sustained when the challenge is raised for the first time in a timely motion in arrest of judgment; and (2) whether…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. People v. GilmoreIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. PujoueIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. YatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Cross v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Williams v. Illinois; Dixon v. Illinois; Yates v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. WydraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  2. People v. BorasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  3. Village of Huntley v. OltmannAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. PEOPLE BY VILL. OF ISLAND LAKE v. LarsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. People v. LarsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API