Legal Opinion

People v. Ringstaff

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 1975No. Docket 17526, 17543, 17517PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, J.

The Supreme Court remanded this case to our Court to consider issues not decided at the original hearing. This case was reported in 53 Mich App 223; 218 NW2d 859 (1974), wherein we reversed the trial court and granted the defendants a new trial because the trial judge had refused to let the defendants read into evidence the transcripts of testimony of a deceased witness at a prior trial.

The Supreme Court held via order, People v Ringstaff, 393 Mich 263; 224 NW2d 287 (1974), that the testimony did not "assist in deciding the critical issues [and] * * * the failure to admit the transcripts or…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Buscaino v. RhodesMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. People v. SchramMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  3. People v. FieldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. FieldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Campau v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1866

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. SchumacherMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API