Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nesbit v. Braker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1908Published

Appeal from judgment entered on decision after trial at Special Term. Judgment. affirmed, with costs.

1Dissent

McLaughlin, J. (dissenting):

I am unable to agree with the other members of-the court that the judgment, in so far as it disallows the first counterclaim pleaded, should be affirmed. There have been two trials of the action. A-t the first trial this counterclaim- was disallowed, but on appeal the judgment was^ reversed as against the evidence and a new trial ordered. (Nesbit v. Braker, 104 App. Div. 393.) Mr. Justice Hatch, in delivering the opinion for a majority of the court, referring to this counterclaim, said: “Aside from mere, oral proof *918however, stand certain, physical conditions which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nesbit v. BrakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API