Hall v. Brookshire
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtConkling, C. J.
Roger Hall, hereinafter called plaintiff, recovered a judgment totaling $8,000 as damages against W. A. Brookshire, hereinafter called defendant, in an action for libel. Defendant filed a motion for new trial and also filed his separate after-trial motion for judgment in accordance with his motion for a directed verdict. RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S., Section 510.290. The latter motion was overruled, but the court sustained defendant’s motion for a new trial. From the order granting a new trial, the plaintiff appealed. Defendant also appealed from the trial court’s order overruling his after-trial…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. HameySupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
- McDuff v. Detroit Evening Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
- State v. DuestrowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- State ex rel. Detroit Fire & Marine Insurance v. EllisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
- Smith v. BurrusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Moore v. GlasgowMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
- Benson v. FeketeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- State v. RutledgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Vaughn v. RipleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
- Helton v. HakeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.