Legal Opinion

National Surety Co. v. Grant

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1913No. Docket No. 97PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Presque Isle; Emerick, J. Assumpsit by the National Surety Company against Fred O. Grant for money had and received. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

In April, 1906, defendant was the outgoing treasurer of the township of North Allis. The township board met on March 21st and found a balance due from defendant to the township of $2,878.73. On April 24, 1906, defendant met William A. Wright, the incoming treasurer, at the office of the Onaway Banking Company, in which institution the township *349funds were deposited, and there turned over to Wright certain paid orders, together with a check for $1,669.30 on the Onaway Banking Company. Altogether these sums equaled the sum of $2,878.73 found by the board to be due. Plaintiff was surety upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Canfield v. City of JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Dupuis v. Saginaw Valley Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Grand Rapids Electric Co. v. Walsh Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Webert v. MaserMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Myers v. WendelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  3. Wilson v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Butler v. RockettMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Hydrex Silent Exhaust Works v. Seager Engine WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API