Faulk v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1DissentClinton, Judge
The constitutional right of assembly, Article I, Section 27, Bill of Rights, is not limited to seeking governmental redress of grievances, and may not be unduly curtailed by state statute. De Jonge v. Oregon, 299 U.S. 353, 364-365, 57 S.Ct. 255, 260, 81 L.Ed. 278 (1937). V.T.C.A.Penal Code, § 42.02 creates the same “chilling effect” on assemblage that an overbroad statute does to exercise of right to free speech, Dombrowski v. Pfister, 380 U.S. 479, 487, 85 S.Ct. 1116, 1121, 14 L.Ed.2d 22 (1965). While assembling may be quite validly regulated where its participants harbor a forbidden intent,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- De Jonge v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Geissler v. CoussoulisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Lichten v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Lichten v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1968