Legal Opinion

Aguilar-Padilla v. Boydstun Equipment Manufacturing, LLC

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided December 17, 2024No. 3:21-cv-00753Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION JULIO AGUILAR-PADILLA, No. 3:21-cv-00753-MO Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. BOYDSTUN EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING, LLC, Defendant. MOSMAN, J., This matter comes before me on Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees (“Mot.”) [147]. For the reasons stated below, I GRANT Plaintiff’s Motion, and I award attorney fees and costs of $453,005.91, BACKGROUND Plaintiff Julio Aguilar-Padilla (“Plaintiff”) sued his former employer on May 14, 2021, for terminating him and withholding sick pay during a state-mandated quarantine after…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. In Re Bluetooth Headset Products LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API