Putney v. Lehigh Truck Equipment Corp.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Per curiam
In this aetion claiming damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile collision, the plaintiff recovered a verdict of $12,000. Liability was admitted, and the sole error assigned is the court’s refusal to set aside the verdict as excessive.
The record leaves much to be desired. For no apparent reason an extensive finding was made. The action of the court on a motion to set aside a verdict is to be tested by the evidence. The finding serves no purpose. Practice Book § 416. Furthermore, the assignment of errors should have been filed with the appeal. Id., § 388; Maltbie, Conn. App.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fairbanks v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Slabinski v. DixSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Varley v. MotylSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
3Cited by10 opinions
- Healy v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- State v. BillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Brown v. BlauveltSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Lupak v. KaralekasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Cooke v. United Aircraft CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.