Legal Opinion

Bourque v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 16, 2003No. 2001-259-AppealPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Concluding that a supermarket had coerced an alleged shoplifter into signing a release by threatening to detain her until she did so, a Superior Court jury returned a civil verdict against the supermarket, finding it liable for damages. The defendant supermarket, Stop & Shop Companies, Inc. (Stop & Shop), appeals from the judgment for damages in favor of the plaintiff, Lois Bourque, in this action for false imprisonment, false arrest, and extortion. A single justice of this Court ordered the parties to show cause why we should not decide this appeal summarily. Because they have not…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. DiCiccoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
  2. Vallinoto v. DiSandroSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  3. Palmisano v. TothSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
  4. In Re Jean Marie W.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
  5. Kelly v. Rhode Island Public Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Botelho v. Caster's Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  2. Fenwick v. ObermanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  3. Mead v. Papa RazziSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
  4. Petro v. Town of West Warwick ex rel. MooreDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2012
  5. New England Retail Properties, Inc. v. Commerce Park Associates 11, LLC.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API